ReviewFrontiers in medicine2026
Protein nutritional support in critically ill patients: pathophysiological basis, clinical evidence, and areas of uncertainty - a narrative review.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Development of a nutritional management protocol for patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a Delphi study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein metabolic derangement is a hallmark of critical illness and contributes to adverse outcomes and delayed recovery. This narrative review synthesises current evidence on protein metabolism, requirement assessment, and supplementation strategies in critically ill adults, with emphasis on sepsis and severe burns as representative hypercatabolic phenotypes. Sepsis and major burns are characterised by accelerated skeletal muscle breakdown, negative nitrogen balance, and sustained functional impairment. Current guidelines generally support progressive enteral-first protein delivery after haemodynamic stabilisation, targeting at least 1.2-1.3 g/kg/day, whereas higher targets are more consistently justified in severe burns because of prolonged hypermetabolism, exudative losses, and wound-healing demands. However, randomised trials and meta-analyses do not show a uniform mortality benefit from higher protein provision, and very high early doses may be harmful in selected patients, particularly those with acute kidney injury or poor metabolic tolerance. Evidence for specific protein sources, functional amino acids, micronutrients, probiotics, and metabolic modulators remains heterogeneous. Future research should define phenotype-specific protein strategies using metabolic, structural, functional, and long-term patient-centred outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.