Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42040583›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

The patient journey and guideline-concordant care in colorectal cancer-is current practice enough?

Carlton C Barnett, Gavin R Oliver, Michael Rutenberg Schoenberg, Hans P Smith, W Roy Smythe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Carlton C BarnettXilis, Inc., Durham, NC, United States.
Gavin R OliverXilis, Inc., Durham, NC, United States.
Michael Rutenberg SchoenbergXilis, Inc., Durham, NC, United States.
Hans P SmithXilis, Inc., Durham, NC, United States.
W Roy SmytheXilis, Inc., Durham, NC, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer is a major healthcare burden, and modern management of non-metastatic disease largely depends on guideline-concordant care based on histopathologic staging and empiric systemic therapy. While multidisciplinary care pathways and standardized guidelines have improved outcomes at the population level, they fall short in addressing the inter-patient and intra-tumoral heterogeneity that contributes to treatment resistance, recurrence of the disease, and unnecessary toxicity. Using a hypothetical patient journey, this commentary highlights how current practice often fails to align with patient needs despite being guideline-concordant. We discuss the limitations of current treatment paradigms and the shortcomings of modern tools such as genomic profiling, highlighting the continued need for complementary approaches. We hypothesize that functional precision medicine approaches have the potential to complement existing treatment paradigms and improve therapeutic stratification. We provide illustrative examples of their potential utility drawn from our recent clinical correlation study on colorectal cancer, in which we reported an association between assay outcomes and clinical response in a retrospective cohort. Additionally, we demonstrate the ability to identify intra-patient heterogeneity in

Indexed as

colorectal cancerfunctional precision medicineguideline concordant caremetastasisminimal residual diseasenew approach methodologiesresistant subclonestumor heterogeneity

Identifiers

PMID42040583
PMCPMC13102779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.