ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Cutaneous adverse reactions associated with enfortumab vedotin: a pharmacovigilance study based on the FDA adverse event reporting system.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Enfortumab vedotin (EV), a Nectin-4-directed antibody-drug conjugate, improves survival in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) after prior platinum-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, EV-associated cutaneous adverse events (AEs) may be underrecognized in real-world practice. Methods: We performed a pharmacovigilance study using the U.S. FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database (2020-2025). EV-related cutaneous AE reports were identified and descriptively characterized. Disproportionality analyses were conducted to detect safety signals, and time-to-onset (TTO) was evaluated. Multivariable analyses were used to explore clinical factors associated with cutaneous AEs and death among EV reports. Results: A total of 1,389 EV-associated cutaneous AE cases were identified. The most frequently reported events were rash, pruritus, and alopecia, alongside severe reactions including Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis. We detected 44 positive cutaneous safety signals, including 10 not described in the EV label. Most cutaneous AEs occurred early after treatment initiation and were reported predominantly in elderly male patients. Concomitant prednisolone use was associated with higher reporting of cutaneous AEs and increased mortality, whereas concomitant amlodipine use was associated with lower reporting of cutaneous AEs. Conclusion: Real-world FAERS data indicate that enfortumab vedotin is associated with a broad and evolving spectrum of cutaneous adverse events, including early-onset and potentially life-threatening reactions. We identified 10 previously unlabeled safety signals, and most events occurred within the first 2 weeks after treatment initiation. The proposed clinical priority framework may help support risk stratification and pharmacovigilance monitoring. Although causality cannot be established using spontaneous reporting data, these findings highlight the importance of early dermatologic surveillance and individualized safety management during EV therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.