Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42040550›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Construction and evaluation of the knowledge graph and large model question-answering system for Jin San Zhen therapy: a tool study for primary care and general practice.

Junjie Chen, Minting Luo, Jianchao Chen, Guangming Luo, Genxin Li, Chubin Lei, Dongjing Chen, Jin Yu, Kunru Gu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Junjie ChenSchool of Acupuncture and Rehabilitation Clinical Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Minting LuoSchool of Acupuncture and Rehabilitation Clinical Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Jianchao ChenAustralian Chinese Medicine Commerce Association, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Guangming LuoGuangzhou Zihetang Traditional Chinese Medicine Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Genxin LiSchool of Acupuncture and Rehabilitation Clinical Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Chubin LeiSchool of Acupuncture and Rehabilitation Clinical Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Dongjing ChenSchool of Acupuncture and Rehabilitation Clinical Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Jin YuSchool of Acupuncture and Rehabilitation Clinical Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Kunru GuSchool of Acupuncture and Rehabilitation Clinical Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Jin San Zhen acupuncture therapy is a classical Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) school originating from the Lingnan region of China. It is widely used in China for central nervous system diseases, internal medical conditions, and various pain disorders, benefiting a large number of patients. However, the related clinical evidence and expert experience are scattered across journal articles and monographs, without systematic curation or structured presentation, making it difficult for frontline clinicians and trainees to access in a timely manner. Although general-purpose large language models (LLMs) can generate answers, they are prone to "hallucinations" and lack traceable evidence-based support. Objective: Based on Chinese clinical research literature and authoritative monographs from the past decade, this study aimed to construct a Knowledge Graph (KG) for Jin San Zhen and to develop an intelligent question-answering (QA) system that combines the KG with LLMs to answer clinical and educational questions related to Jin San Zhen. Methods: We searched Chinese databases such as China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, and CQVIP for clinical studies published between 2016 and 2025 in which Jin San Zhen was the main intervention, and incorporated information on point combinations and clinical practice from four authoritative monographs. Following a PRISMA-style selection process (905 initial records → 416 after deduplication → 191 included studies) we designed an ontology comprising seven entity types (diseases, acupoints, acupoint combinations, treatment plans, etc.) and nine relation types. We used the Qwen3-MAX LLM for information extraction, supplemented by manual verification, and ultimately constructed the KG in Neo4j. We evaluated the KG intrinsically using Precision, Recall, and F1 metrics against a human-annotated gold standard derived from stratified sampling ( Results: The final KG contained 921 nodes and 3,745 relations, including more than 80 diseases, over 360 standardized acupoints, 55 core acupoint combinations, and 298 treatment plans, systematically representing the "disease-plan-acupoint" relationships and efficacy characteristics of Jin San Zhen. Intrinsic evaluation showed that the KG achieved post-refinement F1 scores of 0.952 for main acupoints ( Conclusion: Compared with a general-purpose LLM, the Jin San Zhen knowledge-graph-based QA system-particularly with the tiered confidence generation strategy-markedly improves the accuracy, professionalism, and completeness of answers while providing traceable evidence with explicit confidence labeling. The system thus has the potential to serve as an auxiliary tool for primary care and general practitioners to rapidly access information on Jin San Zhen, perform evidence integration, and support teaching. Future prospective studies in real-world clinical settings are needed to evaluate its actual impact on decision quality and patient outcomes.

Indexed as

intelligent question answeringJin San Zhenknowledge graphlarge language modeltraditional Chinese medicine

Identifiers

PMID42040550
PMCPMC13103959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.