Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42040530›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026

Eight Women With Autologous Fat Transfer and Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction: Which Do They Prefer, and Why?

Wessel B W van der Venne, Imi Choudhury, Thijs de Wit, Esther M Heuts, René R W J van der Hulst, Andrzej A Piatkowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wessel B W van der VenneFrom the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Imi ChoudhuryFaculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Thijs de WitDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands.
Esther M HeutsDepartment of General Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
René R W J van der HulstFrom the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Andrzej A PiatkowskiFrom the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Autologous fat transfer (AFT) is emerging as an alternative autologous reconstruction postmastectomy. This study compared patient-reported outcomes of AFT and deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap in women who underwent both procedures. Methods: In this mixed-methods, cross-sectional study, 8 women meeting inclusion criteria completed BREAST-Q and BODY-Q surveys, of whom 6 subsequently participated in semistructured interviews. Quantitative data compared satisfaction, physical well-being, and sensation. Qualitative thematic analysis explored patient experiences. Additional clinical data were collected retrospectively. Results: DIEP flap reconstruction showed superior scores across domains, with a statistically significant advantage in physical well-being ( Conclusions: In this exploratory study of women who experienced both DIEP flap and AFT breast reconstruction, AFT appeared to yield satisfaction similar to DIEP flap reconstruction, but further research is required to validate these observations.

Identifiers

PMID42040530
PMCPMC13108662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.