ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026
A Multidisciplinary Approach to Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Newborns with micrognathia and upper airway obstruction undergoing mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) should be properly selected to minimize adverse outcomes. We aim to describe the outcomes of patients undergoing MDO who were evaluated through an interdisciplinary approach by the surgical and medical subspecialties of an American Cleft Palate Association-accredited team. Methods: This descriptive, retrospective cohort study included all patients diagnosed with glossoptosis, micrognathia, or Pierre Robin sequence who underwent MDO between 2017 and 2022 at our center. A protocol review and retrospective review of each patient's electronic health record were conducted. The primary outcome was the incidence of tracheostomy. Secondary outcomes included postoperative major and minor complications, the incidence of gastrostomy tube dependence, and the presence of feeding difficulties. Results: Fifteen patients who underwent bilateral MDO between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2022, were included. Fourteen patients avoided tracheostomy. One patient underwent tracheostomy at the time of MDO and was eventually decannulated. There were no instances of conversions to tracheostomy, postoperative hardware loss, nonunion, malunion, or need for repeat distraction. There were 5 instances of pin-site cellulitis and 3 instances of postoperative gastrostomy tube use. Postoperatively, 47% of patients demonstrated improvement in feeding difficulties. Conclusions: This case series illustrates the outcomes of newborns with micrognathia and upper airway obstruction who underwent MDO and were evaluated perioperatively by an interdisciplinary team. In this series, most patients avoided tracheostomy, and postoperative complications were minimal. These findings may inform institutional protocols for multidisciplinary patient management in MDO planning and execution.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.