ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026
Multimodal Assessment of Biomechanical and Neuromuscular Characteristics of Zygomaticus Major in Healthy Participants.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The midfacial plane overlying the zygomaticus major (ZM) muscle undergoes unique compressive/tensile forces and displacements that vary with emotional expressions. In cases of facial paralysis, surgeons attempt to recapitulate these dynamics with muscle transplantation. New technologies attempting to simulate these movements require a holistic understanding of the biomechanical and neuromuscular characteristics of the midface and lower face. Methods: We recruited 33 healthy participants (12 men, 21 women) and measured physical movements, forces, and surface electromyography (sEMG) characteristics of the midface associated with smiling and puckering expressions. We assessed measures of central tendency and quantified characteristic neuromuscular features. We also trained machine learning classifiers to accurately predict muscular loading based on the sEMG features. Results: The midfacial ZM plane experiences a maximum contraction of 9.8% ± 3.1% during smiling while exerting a force of 0.93 ± 0.48 N. Conversely, it experiences a maximum extension of 9.2% ± 3.4% and a tension of 0.47 ± 0.23 N during puckering. Furthermore, we observed the emergence of characteristic neuromuscular features associated with varying degrees of biomechanical loading, which allowed us to successfully train machine classifiers to differentiate between facial expressions with up to 86% accuracy. Conclusions: We have successfully performed multimodal assessment of the physical and functional parameters (displacement, force, and sEMG patterns) associated with the midfacial ZM plane. Our results present a benchmark for the quantitative assessment of the midface and lower face, which could provide metrics for functional rehabilitation or even training data for technologies that may attempt to recapitulate facial animation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.