ArticleNeuroscience informatics2026
Fully Automated Deep Learning-Based Pipeline for Evans Index Measurement from Raw 3D MRI.
Article in Neuroscience informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ventriculomegaly is a key neuroimaging feature of normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) and other disorders of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamics. The Evans Index (EI), defined as the ratio of maximal frontal horn width to maximal inner skull diameter, is a widely used marker of ventricular enlargement. However, manual EI measurement is susceptible to inter-observer variability and depends on accurate alignment to the anterior commissure-posterior commissure (AC-PC) plane, limiting reproducibility in large and multi-center studies. We developed a fully automated deep learning-based pipeline for EI calculation directly from raw T1-weighted MPRAGE MRI scans. The pipeline integrates automated landmark detection using the BrainSignsNet model, rigid AC-PC alignment for orientation standardization, and robust segmentation of the lateral ventricles (LV) and intracranial volume (ICV) using nnU-Net models. Ventricular segmentation is performed with a custom network trained on 1,300 manually annotated scans enriched for hydrocephalus. The Evans Index is then derived automatically from frontal horn width and inner skull diameter measured on the aligned axial slice. Internal validation across the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging, BIOCARD, and Johns Hopkins cohorts demonstrated excellent segmentation performance (Dice coefficient = 0.98). External validation in the PENS trial, including pre- and post-shunt NPH scans, showed strong agreement with expert manual EI measurements (mean bias = 0.0068, mean absolute error = 0.0103, r = 0.96, p < 0.001), with no bias related to age, sex, or ventricular volume. This automated, orientation-standardized approach enables accurate, reproducible, and scalable Evans Index assessment for clinical and research applications, particularly in NPH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.