ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026
Frequency shaping of tactile perception via transcutaneous interferential electrical stimulation: a simulation study.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electrotactile feedback via transcutaneous interferential electrical stimulation generates temporally modulated stimulation fields and enables frequency-domain adjustment with carrier and beat frequencies. To systematically characterize these effects, we present a simulation framework that integrates tissue-scale electrical potential simulation with the finite element method and axon-scale dynamics using the axon cable equation, which incorporates cable theory and the Hodgkin-Huxley model, to predict axon activation and tactile perceptual metrics. We simulated a simplified glabrous skin model with three orthogonally oriented axons. Results show that the carrier frequency in the range of 1-4 kHz determines the upper bounds of the perceived field size, reaching up to 1.6 mm and exceeding the 1 mm electrode diameter, and perceived intensity, whereas the beat frequency in the range of 0-100 Hz adjusts these quantities within these bounds. Furthermore, axons oriented perpendicular to the skin surface exhibit lower activation thresholds than those oriented parallel. Unlike the conventional approaches of transcutaneous electrical stimulation, our results suggest that transcutaneous interferential electrical stimulation can shape the perceived field and perceived intensity without electrode reconfiguration or amplitude modulation. These findings clarify the distinct roles of carrier and beat frequency in tactile perception. This paper provides a theoretical foundation for frequency-domain adjustment of electrotactile interfaces and points toward compact, programmable systems. Quantitative validation through psychophysical experiments will further test and refine these predictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.