ArticleGlobal implementation research and applications2024
Implementation Determinants of a Digital Program for Children Coping with High Conflict Separation/Divorce.
Article in Global implementation research and applications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Human-centered design of a digital coping intervention for children experiencing post-separation interparental conflict.Mental health & prevention · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Interparental conflict (IPC) is the most documented risk factor for the development of child mental health problems when parents separate or divorce. This study represents the first step in a multi-phase project to strengthen adaptive coping and reduce mental health problems in children exposed to high IPC after separation/divorce. Our overarching goal is to develop a scalable digital coping program that can reach its intended audience should it show positive effects in effectiveness trials. This study identified key implementation determinants before program development to ensure its design supports successful implementation. We interviewed 20 family law professionals and 15 separating/divorcing parents. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) guided our inductive coding process to examine three research questions: (1) Is a digital coping program needed and wanted by the family law community?; (2) How do we design and structure a program that courts will adopt, providers will recommend, parents will support, and children will enjoy?; (3) How do we support the widespread use of a program for children facing high-IPC separation/divorce? Participants unequivocally expressed that a digital coping program is needed and wanted. They advised us to design and structure a program that is acceptable to parents and aligned with court procedures. To support widespread use, participants stated it must be affordable with a sliding scale option. The themes derived from the qualitative data provided a roadmap for addressing anticipated barriers and facilitators to implementation in the early stages of program design and development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.