ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
Organic amendments boost maize yield (
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Sustainable food production in fragile karst landscapes requires moving beyond input-intensive agriculture. Methods: This study investigated how long-term organic amendments affected maize yield, using a 15-year field trial on karst yellow soil. Integrating soil analysis, metagenomics, and causal modeling, revealed that adding farmyard manure or bio-organic fertilizer to mineral NPK increased yield by 12.08% and 11.48%, respectively, and improved key soil properties, most notably available phosphorus. Results: Organic inputs shifted the soil microbiome toward copiotrophic taxa and enriched genes for organic matter decomposition and phosphorus mobilization. However, statistical modeling revealed that these biological changes did not directly drive yield. Instead, the primary pathway was hierarchical: amendments first enhanced the soil's chemical habitat, which then directly boosted crop growth while simultaneously shaping the microbial community and its functional potential. The interaction of soil, microbes, and genes together explained 81% of the yield variation. Discussion: Our findings demonstrate that in phosphorus-limited karst soils, organic amendments act foremost as soil conditioners. Microbial processes, though crucial, are secondary mediators that translate improved soil conditions into efficient nutrient cycling. Therefore, sustainable intensification in these vulnerable agroecosystems should prioritize managing soil health over directly targeting microbial processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.