Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42040291›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026

Intercrop-mediated inducibility affects direct defenses and plant resistance but not indirect defenses in maize.

Juan Pablo Jordán, Anna DiPaola, Alison G Power, Katja Poveda, André Kessler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Juan Pablo JordánDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Anna DiPaolaDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Alison G PowerDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Katja PovedaDepartment of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.
André KesslerDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional intercropping aims to beneficially associate two or more plant species or varieties, simultaneously increasing plant diversity and the provisioning of ecosystem services. Although the benefits of diversified cropping systems are widespread and well documented, the underlying mechanisms of increased pest resistance and the relative contributions of different modes of plant defense remain unclear. Plant chemistry can mediate resistance to herbivores through toxic or antidigestive modes of action (direct defenses) or by providing host finding cues that recruit natural enemies that predate on herbivore populations (indirect defenses). Both direct and indirect defense can be elevated in response to previous herbivore damage leading to induced resistance. Here we address the question of how intercropping with four companion plants (alfalfa, bean, Desmodium, and red clover) affects the constitutive and induced expression of plant direct/indirect defenses and resulting herbivore resistance. We found that defensive plant secondary metabolite production of focal maize plants varies with both, previous herbivore damage (induction treatment) and the presence of an intercrop species. Intercropping - specifically with Desmodium - alters the expression of plant chemical defenses and increases plant resistance in 1) no-choice bioassays by reducing larval performance and 2) the incidence of damaged leaves at the field-scale experiment. Thereby some intercrop species do not only directly affect maize plant secondary metabolism but also alter how defensive metabolites are expressed in response to herbivory (intercrop-mediated induced responses). In contrast to direct resistance, the expression of indirect resistance did not vary with intercropping or herbivory suggesting that under realistic field conditions, direct defenses are more reliable as pest control mechanisms than chemical information-mediated indirect defenses. However, within-plant spatial separation of predation pressure suggests a role of vegetation structure in the efficiency of biocontrol. We present evidence that 'intercrop-mediated induced responses' is an integrated ecological mechanism determining the outcome of associational resistance (or susceptibility) and conclude that intercrop-mediated alterations of constitutive and herbivory-induced secondary metabolite production mediate increased associational resistance in diversified maize systems.

Indexed as

chemical defensescompanion croppinginduced responsesintercroppingplant defenseplant secondary metabolites

Identifiers

PMID42040291
PMCPMC13106325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.