ArticleFrontiers in health services2026
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of healthcare providers toward gender dysphoria in Saudi Arabia.
Article in Frontiers in health services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Gender dysphoria (GD) involves a marked incongruence between an individual's experienced gender and their sex assigned at birth. Individuals with GD often experience a strong desire to be treated as another gender and frequently face significant health disparities, including limited access to care, higher risks of depression, and suicide. These challenges are often exacerbated by healthcare providers' knowledge gaps and discriminatory attitudes. This study's objective is to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of healthcare providers in Saudi Arabia regarding GD and to identify gaps that could inform targeted educational interventions. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted with healthcare providers in Saudi Arabia (Nov 2024-Jun 2025). A total of 156 responses were gathered. The questionnaire included domains of knowledge (9 items), attitude (11 items), and practice (4 items) on a 7-point Likert scale. Missing responses, including "I don't know," were imputed. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize participant responses. Associations among knowledge, attitude, and practice scores were examined using Spearman's rank-order correlation, with additional subgroup analyses conducted to explore variations by demographic characteristics. Results: Participants demonstrated moderate to strong knowledge and generally positive attitudes toward individuals with GD, particularly regarding pronoun use, mental health assessment, and awareness of health disparities. However, practical engagement was limited, with only 19% reporting direct clinical experience and a few having received GD-related training. Scores varied by age, training level, and specialty, as respondents aged 24-39 years showed the strongest knowledge and attitude scores, and practice scores were highest among those aged 40-49 years, while senior registrars demonstrated the highest overall KAP scores, and psychiatry showed the strongest overall specialty profile. Conclusion: Healthcare providers demonstrate foundational knowledge and supportive attitudes but limited practical experience in managing GD. Targeted training and structured clinical exposure are recommended to improve culturally competent and inclusive care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.