Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42040255›Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2026

Improving Face Age Prediction by Using Multiple-Angle Photos.

Botond Bárdos-Deák, Bence Király, Csaba Kerepesi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Botond Bárdos-DeákInstitute for Computer Science and Control (SZTAKI), Hungarian Research Network (HUN-REN), Budapest, Hungary.
Bence KirályInstitute for Computer Science and Control (SZTAKI), Hungarian Research Network (HUN-REN), Budapest, Hungary.
Csaba KerepesiInstitute for Computer Science and Control (SZTAKI), Hungarian Research Network (HUN-REN), Budapest, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9541-246X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Face photo-based age provides a cost-effective and readily accessible tool for biological age studies. However, artificial intelligence-based face photo age models were usually trained on a single front-view photo per subject. Here, we hypothesized that face photo-based age prediction performance might be improved by using multiple photos of the same subject at the same time, captured from different angles. To test this hypothesis, we used an available dataset containing mugshots and developed age prediction models trained on (a) only front-view images, (b) only the side-view images, and (c) both front and side images. We found that accurate age prediction is possible using side photos despite the smaller facial area compared to front-facing photos [mean absolute error (MAE) = 3.1 years for the front-view and MAE = 3.7 years for the side-view images]. The age prediction performance further improved by using 2 images from one person at the same time, captured from 2 different angles, front and side (MAE = 2.88 years). We found that subjects who age faster based on front-view face photos generally age faster based on side-view face photos. We also found that side-view models handle the rotation of the face better compared to the front-view model. In summary, we showed that 2 photos of the face at different angles can slightly improve age prediction and may provide a more robust and better approximation of biological age compared to single photos, serving as a useful tool for personalized medicine, aging intervention, and rejuvenation studies. The models are available for academic research purposes at https://photoage.sztaki.hu/.

Identifiers

PMID42040255
PMCPMC13104633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.