Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42040248›Full record

ArticleOrthopedic reviews2026

Abrupt Loss of Spinal Cord Stimulation After Trauma: A Case-Based Approach to Evaluation and Management.

Jamal Hasoon, Musa M Aner, Cyrus Yazdi, Christopher L Robinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopedic reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jamal HasoonDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston.
Musa M AnerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth.
Cyrus YazdiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.
Christopher L RobinsonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an established therapy for refractory neuropathic pain following lumbar spine surgery and frequently allows for meaningful pain reductio, functional improvement, and minimizing reliance on pharmacotherapy and opioids. Despite its efficacy, hardware-related complications remain an important cause of treatment failure. We present a fictional teaching case of a 68-year old man with persistent bilateral radicular pain after lumbar decompression who experienced 80% relief following SCS implantation. Eight months later, after a motor vehicle collision, he developed abrupt loss of stimulation coverage and recurrence of severe neuropathic symptoms. This teaching case discusses appropriate next steps for evaluation and management in this particular clinical scenario.

Indexed as

hardware complicationsneuromodulationneuropathic painSpinal cord stimulation

Identifiers

PMID42040248
PMCPMC13108913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.