Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42040227›Full record

ArticleHorticulture research2026

Strategic global data integration to improve genomic prediction accuracy in tree breeding programs facing resource limitations, a case study in mango.

Abdulqader Jighly, Norman Munyengwa, Reem Joukhadar, Vanika Garg, Natalie Dillon, Rhys G R Copeland, Jugpreet Singh, Sukhwinder Singh, Christopher I Cazzonelli, Penghao Wang and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Horticulture research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Abdulqader JighlyState Agricultural Biotechnology Centre, Centre for Crop and Food Innovation, Food Futures Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, 6150, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2712-3698
Norman MunyengwaQueensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia.
Reem JoukhadarAgriSapiens PTY LTD, VIC 3108, Australia.
Vanika GargState Agricultural Biotechnology Centre, Centre for Crop and Food Innovation, Food Futures Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, 6150, Australia.
Natalie DillonQueensland Department of Primary Industries, Mareeba, Queensland 4880, Australia.
Rhys G R CopelandState Agricultural Biotechnology Centre, Centre for Crop and Food Innovation, Food Futures Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, 6150, Australia.
Jugpreet SinghDepartment of Horticultural Sciences, University of Florida IFAS, Tropical Research and Education Centre, Homestead, FL 33031, USA.
Sukhwinder SinghUnited States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Subtropical Horticulture Research Station (SHRS), Miami, FL 33158, USA.
Christopher I CazzonelliHawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Hawkesbury Campus, Western Sydney University, Richmond, New South Wales 2753, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3096-3193
Penghao WangState Agricultural Biotechnology Centre, Centre for Crop and Food Innovation, Food Futures Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, 6150, Australia.
Peter PrentisCentre for Agriculture and Bioeconomy, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland 4001, Australia.
Craig HardnerQueensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia.
Rajeev K VarshneyState Agricultural Biotechnology Centre, Centre for Crop and Food Innovation, Food Futures Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, 6150, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic prediction (GP) in mango breeding faces challenges due to the species' complex biology, long cycles, and limited reference populations. To accelerate genetic improvement, this study integrated data from diverse global populations to increase the reference population size. It included three mango collections reserved in Australia (225), USA (161), and China (224), totaling 610 individuals. Fruit weight (FW) and total soluble solids (TSS) were measured in multiple datasets, while several other traits were measured in specific datasets. We evaluated genetic diversity, performed genome-wide association studies (GWAS), and assessed GP accuracy using standard, genotype-by-environment (GxE), and multitrait models, both within and across collections. Findings revealed a highly admixed genetic structure, with faster linkage disequilibrium (LD) decay in the Chinese collection, indicating higher genetic diversity. Data integration significantly enhanced GWAS power, identifying 19 quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for FW and 9 for TSS. GxE models consistently achieved higher or comparable prediction accuracies for FW and TSS compared to the non-GxE models, especially when combining Australian and US collections. This was not the case when predicting into or from the Chinese collection, mostly due to differences in the phenotyping protocol. While single-trait models performed comparably to multitrait models in predicting new individuals (Cross-Validation: CV1), multitrait models significantly improved prediction accuracy in scenarios with incomplete phenotypic records (CV2). This study demonstrates that strategic global data integration significantly enhances GWAS power and GP accuracy in mango. This collaborative approach is crucial for developing more efficient and accelerated breeding programmes for mango and other perennial trees.

Identifiers

PMID42040227
PMCPMC13103480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.