ReviewNational science review2026
Towards a sustainable high-quality materials data ecosystem: frameworks and strategies.
Review in National science review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High-quality data have increasingly been recognized as a critical catalyst in advancing artificial intelligence-driven materials discovery and design. However, the current data generation and management systems in materials science are often deficient, resulting in an abundance of low-quality data characterized by heterogeneous formats, incomplete entries and semantic inconsistencies. Such a fragmented data landscape limits direct access to reliable datasets, making it inevitable to allocate substantial resources toward data consolidation and governing existing data. Here, we propose a comprehensive quality-controlled framework encompassing all three principal stages of the research lifecycle-acquisition, management and utilization. By establishing stage-specific requirements, materials data quality can be concurrently optimized and enhanced throughout the materials research and development process. Furthermore, we propose five strategic initiatives to operationalize this framework, including an integrated computational/experimental 'data factory' for data acquisition and an automated toolkit for data quality assessment. This work aims to embed quality-governed production directly into scientific inquiry, fostering a sustainable and robust materials data ecosystem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.