SynthesisFrontiers in public health2026
Systematic review of physical activity measurement scales validated for Arabic-speaking populations: insights from the BRIDGE project.
Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between physical activity and blood pressure control among Moroccan adults with hypertension.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- Associations between physical activity, physical fitness, sedentary behavior, and mathematics achievement in school-aged children: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in cognition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurate assessment of physical activity (PA) is essential for epidemiological research and public health surveillance. In Arabic-speaking countries, most PA questionnaires originate from Western contexts, raising concerns about their cultural relevance and psychometric robustness when applied without proper validation. Objective: This systematic review aimed to identify PA measurement instruments available in Arabic and to critically appraise their psychometric properties using the COSMIN methodology. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus from inception to 2025, following PRISMA guidelines. Validation studies of PA questionnaires administered to Arabic-speaking populations were included. Data extraction and methodological quality assessment were independently performed by two reviewers. Psychometric properties were evaluated according to COSMIN criteria and classified as sufficient, insufficient, indeterminate, or variable. Results: A total of 21 studies were included, encompassing 13 different instruments across diverse populations and settings. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) was the most frequently validated tool. Reliability and criterion validity were the most frequently assessed properties and generally demonstrated good methodological quality. However, criterion validity was often insufficient, particularly for widely used instruments such as the IPAQ and GPAQ. Structural validity, measurement error, responsiveness, and cross-cultural validity were rarely evaluated. Instruments designed for specific populations, such as older adults or individuals with disabilities, tended to show more favorable psychometric performance. Conclusion: Although several PA measurement instruments are available in Arabic, their psychometric evaluation remains heterogeneous and frequently incomplete. No instrument currently meets all COSMIN recommendations for robust psychometric quality. Future validation studies should adopt more comprehensive and methodologically rigorous approaches to improve the quality and comparability of PA measurement tools in Arabic-speaking contexts. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420261286986.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.