ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Estimating the environmental burden of disease in children and adolescents in Germany: limitations and possible solutions.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Children and adolescents play an exceptional role in our society especially when it comes to safeguarding their health and given their higher susceptibility to environmental risk factors and ongoing physical development. Method: We used data from the population-representative cross-sectional German Environmental Survey for Children and Adolescents (GerES V) and assessed the feasibility of applying the environmental burden of disease method for estimating the burden of environmental risks for children and adolescents in Germany. In this context, we highlight the challenges and discuss potential strategies how to deal with them. Results: In a four steps approach encompassing exposure assessment, systematic literature search, input data search and environmental burden of disease quantification, we aimed to estimate the impact of 17 risk factors on the health of children and adolescents. Following exposure assessment, eight risk factors were excluded. For the remaining risk factors systematic literature searches were conducted, which yielded exposure-response functions for five risk factors. The subsequent burden of disease estimations for benzene, bisphenol A, particulate matter, secondhand smoke and traffic noise were not fully standardized, allowing only limited comparability. Discussion: In the end, the burden of disease calculations performed varied widely for each risk factor. This variance can be attributed to diverse factors along the calculation processes, including, e.g., the absence of exposure-response functions tailored to children, insufficient exposure data, and gaps in other input data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.