ReviewFrontiers in public health2026
The role of multimodality in clinical disease diagnosis: advances, challenges, and opportunities.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- EnhancingQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have significantly improved medical diagnosis, with deep learning models achieving expert-level performance across unimodal tasks such as medical imaging, physiological signal analysis, electronic health record (EHR) modeling, and omics-based prediction. However, clinical decision-making is inherently multimodal, as diseases manifest through complex interactions among imaging phenotypes, molecular signatures, physiological measurements, and textual clinical documentation. Consequently, unimodal systems often lack robustness, generalizability, and clinical reliability. This survey provides a comprehensive and methodologically grounded review of multimodal learning for disease diagnosis, emphasizing the paradigm shifts that have emerged over the past five years. Beyond classical early, intermediate, and late fusion strategies, we synthesize modern cross-modal representation learning frameworks, including contrastive alignment, vision-language pretraining, graph and hypergraph-based multimodal reasoning, modality-agnostic representation learning, and missing-modality robust architectures. We further examine large-scale foundation-model style multimodal pretraining and recent advances in histology-transcriptomics and image-omics integration, which exemplify biologically grounded cross-modal learning beyond traditional fusion pipelines. In addition to summarizing widely used datasets and clinical applications across oncology, neurology, cardiology, pulmonology, and ophthalmology, we provide a methodological synthesis linking key challenges such as modality heterogeneity, incomplete data, fairness disparities, interpretability limitations, and cross-institutional distribution shift to representative solution frameworks proposed in the literature. By integrating theoretical formulations, architectural insights, and application-driven evidence, this survey moves beyond case-oriented performance comparisons and offers a structured perspective on how multimodal AI is evolving toward scalable, robust, and clinically trustworthy diagnostic systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.