ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Research on the integration development model of "language + culture + tourism + older adults care" based on digital technology.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study empirically examines the effectiveness of integrating "language + culture + tourism + older adults care" services through digital technology to address the challenges of population aging. Using public data from six Chinese cities (Shanghai, Hangzhou, Wuhan, Changsha, Chengdu, Xi'an) collected from June to August 2024, we constructed a Digital Integration Index (DII) and employed structural equation modeling and multiple regression analysis to evaluate integration effects. Results demonstrate that digital integration significantly improves older adults people's quality of life (effect size = 0.68), digital participation (0.74), and service satisfaction (0.71), with synergistic effects contributing approximately one-third of total effects. The integration model shows stronger effects for the 60-65 age group (0.82) and eastern cities (0.79), though central and western regions exhibit greater improvement magnitude. Key success factors include improved dialect recognition accuracy (68 to 89%) and age-friendly interface design. Cost-benefit analysis reveals a 24.3% reduction in per-user service costs post-integration. The study provides quantitative evidence for multi-domain service integration, offering an evidence-based framework for policy-making. Future research should extend observation periods and expand geographic coverage to validate long-term effects and rural applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.