ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
ERAC knowledge, attitudes, and practices among obstetrics and gynecology medical staff.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of obstetrics and gynecology medical staff concerning enhanced recovery after cesarean section (ERAC). Methods: A multi-center cross-sectional survey was conducted between February 22 and March 31, 2025, in 10 hospitals located across various regions of China. A structured questionnaire was employed to collect data on participants' demographic characteristics and assess their scores in the domains of knowledge, attitude, and practice related to ERAC. The cutoff score for each domain was set at 80% of the total possible score to categorize levels as "good" or "poor." Results: A total of 766 valid responses were obtained, yielding a valid questionnaire rate of 85.97%. Among the respondents, 685 (89.43%) were female, and 276 individuals (36.03%) had previously received ERAC-specific training. The average scores were 14.64 ± 5.93 (range: 0-25) for knowledge, 44.18 ± 5.45 (range: 10-50) for attitude, and 32.33 ± 10.30 (range: 10-50) for practice. Structural equation modeling suggested that knowledge was significantly associated with attitude ( Discussion: Despite generally positive attitudes, obstetrics and gynecology medical staff demonstrated insufficient knowledge and suboptimal practices concerning ERAC. Targeted educational interventions and systematic ERAC training programs are urgently needed to bridge the knowledge-practice gap and promote consistent implementation of evidence-based recovery protocols across diverse clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.