ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Psychological impact of an epidemic on the mental health of medical staff: a case study of mobile cabin hospitals in Beijing during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To explore the impact of epidemic diseases outbreak on the psychological status of medical workers. Methods: A total of 266 online questionnaires were distributed to medical staff in several mobile cabin hospitals in Beijing. The questionnaires were divided into a General Demographic Characteristics Questionnaire and the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), and a total score of ≥4 in the GHQ-12 was considered to be a decline in mental health. Results: A total of 266 members of medical staff participated in this study, and 30.1% experienced a decline in mental health recently. The highest prevalence of emotional distress was found among those who were female, married without children, working as doctors and other occupations, aged 30-39 years, working in the confirmation department, supporting the mobile cabin hospitals three times or more, the duration of this support for 1 month or longer, and having a previous state of anxiety and depression. In addition, females experienced higher rates of insomnia due to worry compared to males, as did medical staff in the confirmation department compared to the administration and logistics departments. In the same stressful environment, men and doctors had a greater rate of perceived loss of self-worth than women and nurses. Conclusion: The outbreak of epidemic makes medical workers face the risk of emotional distress. To achieve the purpose of preventing and treating emotional distress of medical workers, we need to carry out continuous and strict research and evaluation on the mental health planning of medical workers, formulate relevant policies and carry out professional psychological intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.