ArticleGalen medical journal2024
In Vitro Investigation of the Effect of Silanizing on the Microshear Repaired Bond Strength of Short-Fiber Composites after Surface Treatment with an Er;Cr:YSGG Laser, Sandblasting, or Bur : Effectiveness of silanizing on the repaired bond strength of Short-fiber composite.
Article in Galen medical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of various interfacial surface treatments on the repair micro shear bond strength (μSBS) of aged short fiber-reinforced composite (SFRC). Materials and Methods: The substrate and repair composite material used in the fabrication of eighty samples were SFRC (Ever-X posterior, GC). Based on the mechanical roughening method, the samples were divided into four categories: diamond bur, sandblasting, laser treatment, and a control group. Then, they were split into two groups using the chemical conditioning method: those using a universal bonding that contains silane and those using a separate silane step before the universal adhesive that contains silane. After 40 days of immersion in distilled water at 37°C, the specimens were removed. Universal testing machine was used to implement SBS testing. Using field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), the surface topography of the composite material was examined after the roughening procedures. Results: Althoughthe study revealed that there was no statistically significant variance in μSBS between groups (P 0.05), but compared between the groups in which silane used, laser has made a significant difference (P 0.05 ). Similarly, no notable distinction was identified in μSBS when utilizing universal adhesive with or without an additional silanizing step (P 0.05). Conclusion: According the data, surface preparation method dosen't affect the repaired μSBS of SFRC composite. If using silane before universal adhesive, laser preparation is effective on increasing bond strength. Also, adding a separate silanization step before using the silane-containing universal adhesive did not enhance the μSBS and isn't necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.