ReviewGalen medical journal2024
A Critical Review of the Efficacy and Safety of Radiological Imaging Techniques in Pediatric Orthodontics.
Review in Galen medical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRadiological imaging plays a pivotal role in pediatric orthodontics, facilitating precise diagnosis, treatment planning, and monitoring of craniofacial anomalies and dental conditions. This narrative review critically evaluates the efficacy and safety of various imaging modalities in pediatric orthodontics, including cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), digital radiography, ultrasound, and emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI) and low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS). MATERIALS AND
methodsThe review examines the literature on the use of different imaging techniques in pediatric orthodontics, focusing on their diagnostic capabilities, radiation exposure, and clinical applications.
resultsWhile advanced imaging techniques have revolutionized orthodontic care, they present unique challenges, particularly concerning radiation exposure in pediatric patients. CBCT has emerged as an invaluable tool for complex cases, offering detailed three-dimensional visualizations crucial for assessing impacted teeth, skeletal discrepancies, and temporomandibular joint disorders. However, its higher radiation dose necessitates judicious use, guided by the ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) principle and dose optimization protocols. Alternatives such as MRI and LIPUS provide radiation-free diagnostic and therapeutic options, underscoring their growing role in pediatric orthodontics. Digital X-rays, with lower radiation doses and improved patient comfort, remain essential for routine assessments, while AI-driven technologies enhance diagnostic accuracy and streamline clinical workflows.
conclusionThe review shows the critical balance between efficacy and safety in pediatric radiological imaging. Innovations in imaging technology, such as ultra-low-dose CBCT and AI-based diagnostic tools, are paving the way for safer, more precise orthodontic care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.