ArticleGalen medical journal2024
Examining The Effects of Silver Diamine Fluoride Treatment on the Surface Morphological Properties and Binding Strength of Demineralized Dentin to Glass Ionomer with and without Potassium Iodide and Glutathione : Examining The Effects of Silver Diamine Fluoride Treatment on the Surface Morphological Properties.
Article in Galen medical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One new and promising chemical for non-invasive and minimally invasive dental caries treatment is silver diamine fluoride (SDF). However, demineralized dentin discolors easily, so it's not a popular choice for permanent teeth or the aesthetic zone. Although this discolouration can be reduced by applying glutathione and potassium iodide (KI) antioxidants, it is unclear how these substances affect the bond strength of glass ionomer (GI) to pre-treated dentin. Consequently, the objective of this research was to evaluate the degree to which dentin treated with SDF plus KI (SDF-KI), SDF plus glutathione (SDF-GLU), or a combination of the two (SDF+GLU) compared to GI in terms of microtensile bond strength (mTBS). We artificially demineralized 75 dentin specimens taken from healthy human permanent teeth to mimic caries. After that, they were connected to self-cure GC-Fuji IX GI and treated in one of five groups: control, SDF, SDF-KI, SDF-GLU, or SDF+GLU (n=15). Their mode of failure was identified under a stereomicroscope after they went through a mTBS test. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was also applied to a subset of specimens from both groups. The control and SDF-KI groups had significantly different mTBS values (P=0.019 and P=0.005, respectively), as did the control and SDF-GLU groups. Compared to the SDF group, the SDF-KI group had a significantly lower mTBS (P=0.024). There was a statistically significant difference between the SDF and SDF-GLU groups in terms of mTBS (P=0.006). When comparing the control group to the SDF and SDF+GLU groups, there was no significant difference in mTBS (P0.05). For optimal dentin surface preparation prior to GI restoration, SDF+GLU is the way to go. The decrease in GI to dentin mTBS is the reason why SDF-KI and SDF-GLU are not suggested.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.