ReviewGalen medical journal2024
Hemodynamic Comparison of Two Nasal Endotracheal Intubation Techniques Using Fiberoptic and Conventional Approaches in Jaw Fracture Surgery Patients: A Study from Kerman, Iran (2020) : Nasal Endotracheal Intubation Techniques in Jaw Fracture Surgery Patients.
Review in Galen medical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation can cause significant hemodynamic changes, resulting in potentially life-threatening complications. This study aimed to compare the hemodynamic effects of traditional endotracheal tube and fiberoptic bronchoscope methods in patients undergoing maxillofacial fracture surgery. Materials and Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, 60 patients with jaw fractures at an institutional tertiary hospital in Kerman, Iran, in 2020 were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned to either the traditional endotracheal tube group (n=30) or the fiberoptic bronchoscope group (n=30). Hemodynamic parameters, including systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, and arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2), were recorded at baseline, and 1, 3, 5, 10, and 15 minutes after anesthesia. Additional assessments included time to peak blood pressure, frequency of SpO2 drop, and postoperative nausea, vomiting, and hoarseness. Results: There were significant differences in systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial blood pressures, as well as heart rate, between the two groups (p 0.05). The highest hemodynamic values occurred 3 minutes after anesthesia in the traditional intubation group and immediately after intubation in the fiberoptic group. SpO2 levels remained stable at 99% throughout the study in both groups. Hemodynamic values declined by the 10th and 15th minutes post-anesthesia. The study reveals that fiberoptic intubation is associated with lower early hemodynamic fluctuations compared to traditional intubation. This is particularly important as it suggests that fiberoptic intubation may mitigate the risk of cardiovascular complications, which can be life-threatening in vulnerable patient populations. Conclusion: Fiberoptic intubation resulted in lower early hemodynamic fluctuations compared to the traditional method, suggesting it may be a safer option for reducing cardiovascular stress during maxillofacial surgery. The current article presents a novel comparison of hemodynamic effects between traditional endotracheal intubation and fiberoptic bronchoscope methods specifically in the context of maxillofacial fracture surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.