Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42040018›Full record

ReviewGalen medical journal2024

The Role of Guided Bone Regeneration in Enhancing Dental Implant Success : Guided Bone Regeneration in Dental Implant.

Emad Taghizadeh, Sahar Negargar, Kosar Nuroozi Larki, Raman Saberi Haghighi, Hossein Shahoon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Galen medical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emad TaghizadehDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran.
Sahar NegargarDepartment of Dentistry, Asad Abadi Hospital, Tabriz, Iran.
Kosar Nuroozi LarkiDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Science, Ahvaz, Iran.
Raman Saberi HaghighiDepartment of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hossein ShahoonDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) has become an essential technique in dental implantology, particularly for cases with compromised bone volume that impact implant success. This narrative review examines the role of GBR in enhancing dental implant outcomes, focusing on its applications, biological principles, materials, and clinical protocols. GBR utilizes barrier membranes and bone graft materials to foster bone regeneration in deficient areas, creating a stable foundation for implant placement by preventing soft tissue invasion and promoting osteogenic activity. Through a literature review of recent studies, we assess the clinical efficacy of GBR in addressing bone insufficiencies resulting from periodontal disease, trauma, or resorption following tooth loss, with a particular emphasis on how GBR augments implant stability and long-term survival. The review explores various GBR materials, including resorbable and non-resorbable membranes, and graft types such as autografts, allografts, xenografts, and synthetic options. Additionally, advancements in bioactive membranes, growth factor-enhanced materials, and 3D-printed scaffolds are discussed for their potential to improve regenerative outcomes and reduce procedural complications. Best practices in clinical protocols, including preoperative planning, precise membrane placement, and post-operative care, are analyzed to highlight factors that enhance GBR success. Comparative analyses indicate that GBR significantly improves implant survival and reduces marginal bone loss, demonstrating its efficacy in complex cases. Despite its high success rate, GBR has limitations, such as the potential for complications like peri-implantitis and membrane exposure. The paper concludes with suggestions for future research on optimizing GBR materials, enhancing biological responses, and improving long-term outcomes to broaden its application in dental implantology. This review serves as a resource for clinicians and researchers seeking to maximize implant success through advanced GBR techniques.

Indexed as

Bone AugmentationDental ImplantsDental SurgeryGuided Bone RegenerationImplant Success Rate

Identifiers

PMID42040018
PMCPMC12107309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.