Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42040010›Full record

ArticleGalen medical journal2024

Comparative Analysis of Palatal Depth and Nasal Septum Deviation in Patients with and without Maxillary Canine Impaction: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study : A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study.

Neda Shahraki, Fatemeh Keikhaee, Fatemeh Kahnemuee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Galen medical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Neda ShahrakiDepartment of Orthodontics, Oral and Dental Disease Research Center, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran.
Fatemeh KeikhaeeDepartment of Orthodontics, Oral and Dental Disease Research Center, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran.
Fatemeh KahnemueeDepartment of Orthodontics, Zahedan Dental School, Zahedan University of Medical Science, Zahedan, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The primary aim of this study was to compare palate depth and nasal septum deviation between patients with unilateral and bilateral buccal and palatal impactions of maxillary canines and those without impaction. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study examined CBCT images of 60 patients from a private radiology archive, divided into four subgroups of 10 patients each with unilateral or bilateral buccal and palatal impactions, and a control group of 20 patients without impaction. Nasal deviation was assessed by measuring the distance of the maximum convexity of the deviated septum from the midsagittal plane in the coronal CBCT cut. Palate depth (PD) was measured as the perpendicular line from the middle of the axis connecting the mesiopalatal cusp of the first molar to the hard palate. Measurements were performed using NNT 16.3.1 software and validated by radiology and orthodontics specialists. Independent t-tests were used for statistical comparisons. Results: There were no significant differences in palate depth (p 0.05) or nasal septum deviation (P 0.05) between the control group and patients with unilateral or bilateral buccal and palatal impactions of maxillary canines. Conclusion: The study found no significant differences in palate depth and nasal septum deviation between patients with and without maxillary canine impaction, suggesting that impaction does not significantly affect these anatomical features. Further research is recommended to explore these findings in larger populations.

Indexed as

CanineHardImpactedNasal SeptumPalateTooth

Identifiers

PMID42040010
PMCPMC12328002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.