ArticleGalen medical journal2024
Investigating the Morphology of the Nasal Cavity for Nasal Reconstruction Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography Images : Morphology of the Nasal Cavity for Nasal Reconstruction.
Article in Galen medical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Facial reconstruction is the procedure of rebuilding a face onto an anonymous skull to aid identification in forensic and archaeological cases. This study investigated the morphology of the nasal cavity for reconstruction by using cone beam computed tomography images. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, pre-treatment CBCT images of 220 adults were selected by random sampling from the records of orthodontic clinical data between January 2022 and November 2023. The three-dimensional parameters of the nasal soft structures and hard structures were measured. Results: Of 220 CBCT images, 198 cases (61.1% females and 38.9%males) were examined in the final analysis after meeting inclusion criteria. TStatistically significant sex differences were observed in nasal length (males: 50.79±4.78 mm, females: 45.28±4.18 mm; P0.05), nasal depth (males: 23.54±2.43 mm, females: 26.05 ± 3.53 mm; p 0.05), and nasal height (males: 49.81±4.30 mm, females: 55.02±4.49 mm; P0.05). The nasolabial angle was significantly higher in males (98.21°±8.34°) compared to females (89.71°±7.37°; P0.05). Conversely, the nasal tip angle was significantly higher in females (77.18°±8.45°) than in males (71.54°±8.20°; P0.05). A statistically significant difference was also observed in the nasal upward tip angle between males (23.8 ±3.10°) and females (20.45°±2.98°; P0.05). Conclusion: This study revealed significant sex-based variations in nasal parameters. Males exhibited greater nasal length, depth, and nasal tip angle compared to females.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.