ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2026
Evaluating corneal topographic patterns in keratoconic eyes and their association with keratoconus changes over time.
Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo evaluate various corneal topographic patterns in keratoconus (KCN) and their association with disease progression.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted on 636 eyes of 335 KCN patients (396 males, 240 females) with a mean age of 30.95±7.95y. Participants underwent two ocular examinations, including corneal tomography using the Pentacam-HR. Topographic patterns were classified based on axial curvature, and KCN progression was defined as a change of ≥1.00 D in maximum keratometry (Kmax). Accordingly, evaluated eyes were categorized into progressive, regressive, and stable groups.
resultsThe most common topographic pattern was asymmetric bowtie with inferior steepening (AB-IS, 27.4%) in both males (26.8%) and females (28.3%). In the regressive group, asymmetric bowtie with skewed radial axes (21.3%) was most frequent, while AB-IS (31.3%) and inferior steepening (IS, 25.9%) dominated the stable and progressive groups, respectively. Significant differences were observed in corneal parameters across patterns: the oval pattern exhibited the most negative spherical equivalent and the lowest corrected visual acuity, whereas the irregular pattern showed the highest Kmax values in the first examination (
conclusionCorneal topographic patterns in KCN exhibit distinct characteristics and progression rates. Understanding these patterns can aid in predicting disease progression and tailoring treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.