ReviewHealth care science2026
Fight for the People's Health: The Application of Al Multiagent Systems in Medical Consortia.
Review in Health care science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The nationwide implementation of medical consortia at both district and county levels has reshaped China's healthcare system profoundly by establishing collaborative institutional networks and tiered service delivery pathways. However, difficulties such as loose referral, fragmented information, and resource disparity have hampered the delivery of integrated care in these consortia. Leveraging cutting-edge information technology, this study aims to propose a set of AI-driven integrated medical alliance solutions catering to the needs of patients, medical workers, and administrators. Methods: In the study, we introduce a multiagent system using the coordinator worker model and role-based architecture. The system uses the retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) framework, the ERNIE model, the chain of thought (CoT) reasoning mechanism, and an interactive platform. It is capable of enhancing full life-cycle healthcare service by supporting patients' navigation of the system, doctors' clinical decision-making, and hospital management, providing key functions like triage guidance, medical research assistance, and real-time hospital operational data analysis. Results: This intelligent medical decision support platform provides tailored healthcare, ensures treatment continuity, improves decision-making quality, and optimizes resource allocation efficiency. Discussion: Following the detailed analysis of the applications and advantages of the framework, the study further explores the challenges faced during the implementation of this platform, particularly related to hallucination, data security, and cost control. Conclusions: Finally, it calls for continued efforts to build intelligent, equitable, and high-value healthcare systems through expanded applications of medical multiagent systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.