ArticleInformation (Basel)2026
EHR Sampling Interval Bias Detection and Burden of Blood Pressure Excursions: Implications for Clinical Decision Support and Model Validity in Pediatric ECMO.
Article in Information (Basel), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Routine Electronic Health Record (EHR) blood pressure charting under-samples dynamic physiology, risking missed hemodynamic instability. This study quantifies how HER-like down-sampling changes the detection and burden of hypo- and hypertension versus continuous monitoring and articulates the consequences for clinical decision support and machine learning label quality. We retrospectively analyzed 78 ECMO-supported pediatric patients (2019-2023). The continuous mean arterial pressure (MAP) captured every 5 s was resampled at intervals from 5 s to 1 h. We screened for 3 min windows of hypotension or hypertension at 10th/90th age-normed thresholds, comparing the per-patient event frequency and burden with EHR-derived recordings. At 10th/90th thresholds, hypotension events fell from 13,936 (5 s) to 3803 (15 min; -72.7%); the EHR captured 3471. Hypertension events dropped from 1573 to 410 (-73.9%); the EHR registered 1587. The EHR data overstated hypertension burden, indicating preferential documentation during prolonged instability while missing brief excursions. Standard EHR sampling significantly under-reports blood pressure derangements in pediatric ECMO. This underreporting of brief events may limit the accuracy of clinical decision support tools and machine learning algorithms in high-acuity patients. High-frequency data acquisition improves event capture and should be prioritized for clinical decision support and machine learning development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.