ArticleFrontiers in network physiology2026
The amplitude-amplitude cross-frequency coupling method: a step-by-step guide to quantifying physiological network interactions.
Article in Frontiers in network physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Network integration and evolution of organ systems interactions during incremental exercise.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Article
- Quantitative assessment of heart-brain coupling in neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy.Frontiers in network physiology · 2026Article
- Geometric pacing: external reference support as a principle of physiological stabilization in aging and pre-pathological states.Frontiers in network physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The human organism operates as an integrated network in which multiple physiological systems dynamically coordinate across spatial and temporal scales. Quantifying these interactions requires analytical frameworks that move beyond single-system measures and capture multisystem coordination. Here, we present a detailed, step-by-step description of the Amplitude-Amplitude Cross-Frequency Coupling (ACFC) method, a network-based approach designed to quantify coordination among skeletomuscular, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems using simultaneous electrophysiological recordings. ACFC evaluates how the amplitudes of oscillatory components across specific frequency bands co-vary over time, producing three network-based markers: inter-muscular, cardio-muscular, and respiratory-muscular coupling. The method combines spectral decomposition, cross-correlation analyses, and network dynamics to characterize global network organization and coupling strength for distinct physiological states, and the temporal variability in systems coordination and network interactions at short timescales. Beyond quantifying average coupling and network link strength over extended period of time associated with a given physiological state, ACFC enables probing the temporal coordination of physiological rhythms embedded in systems dynamics, as well as the variability and evolution of their network interactions across timescales and states in response to internal and external demands. Using a bodyweight squat protocol as an illustrative example, we outline all analytical steps, parameter choices, and practical considerations required to implement the ACFC method to quantify physiological systems coupling and network interactions. This Methods article provides a reproducible guide for applying ACFC analyses and is intended to facilitate the adoption, adaptation, and extension of network-based approaches to study multisystem coordination in exercise, aging, and broader physiological or clinical contexts in Network Physiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.