ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2026
Integrating 2D Dermatological Photography with 3D Anatomical Surfaces.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Standardized 2D photography plays an essential role in dermatologic practice, supporting longitudinal documentation, patient monitoring, and consensus-based clinical scoring. However, photographs taken from limited views often suffer from reduced anatomical context and missing body-location information. 3D representations enable unified spatial interpretation of multi-view imagery. Recent developments in computer vision have made it feasible to infer dense correspondences between 2D images and a 3D human mesh. In this study, we explored integrating 2D dermatological images with a 3D surface model using DensePose, a deep learning-based human dense correspondence framework. This creates an anatomically grounded representation that supports mesh-level analyses and recovers spatial context for each image. We use a dataset including four full body photographs (front, back, and each side) from each of 147 subjects with chronic graft-versus-host disease, for a total of 588 images. Our method integrates these multiple 2D full-body photographs captured across varied body shapes and camera angles into a 3D mesh. We further showed that the resulting 3D mesh enables quantification of the extent to which individual 2D images, or their combinations, represent the complete body surface. On average, a single full body view captures 28% of the body surface, while adding a second, third, and fourth view increases average coverage to 50%, 72%, and 80%, respectively. To assess spatial consistency, we annotated up to 10 anatomical landmarks per patient on 80 images across 20 patients and reported a median pairwise geodesic distance between corresponding landmarks of 4.6 cm. These findings can guide how dermatology images are captured and support future opportunities in monitoring, education, and communication using existing infrastructure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.