ReviewJournal of arrhythmia2026
Current Status of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators (ICDs)/Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy With Defibrillators (CRT-Ds) for Primary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death.
Review in Journal of arrhythmia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Among recipients of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) or cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillators (CRT-Ds), non-ischemic etiology is predominant, accounting for more than 60% of cases in Japan, which is higher than that in the United States and other European countries. Despite recent concerns about primary prevention ICD/CRT-D implantation for non-ischemic patients with systolic heart failure in advanced guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT), ICD/CRT-D therapy is likely effective in reducing the slope of the relationship between all-cause death and sudden cardiac death. Two cohort studies in Japan have shown that the cumulative incidence of appropriate ICD/CRT-D therapy is higher among non-ischemic patients than ischemic patients receiving primary prevention ICD/CRT-D implantation. Additionally, recent published cohort studies in the United States, Europe, and Japan reported a significant decrease in the risk of all-cause death in primary prevention ICD/CRT-D recipients compared to those without ICD/CRT-D therapy. Notably, ICD/CRT-D utilization in Japan is the lowest among the Group of Seven (G7) countries. Governmental acknowledgment of the value of primary prevention ICD/CRT-D therapy, as well as educational activities for non-cardiac electrophysiologists, are required to prevent a potential labor shortage and an excess of healthcare costs following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.