Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42039726›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical physics

Transfer Learning-driven Biofield Image Analysis for Predictive Modeling of Diabetes.

Shivanand S Gornale, Supriya Shankar Patil, Anup Waman Deo, Abdulgaphur Athani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical physics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shivanand S GornaleDepartment of Computer Science, School of Mathematics and Computing Sciences, Rani Channamma University, Belagavi, Karnataka, India.
Supriya Shankar PatilDepartment of Computer Science, School of Mathematics and Computing Sciences, Rani Channamma University, Belagavi, Karnataka, India.
Anup Waman DeoInstitute of Biofield Evaluation and Research Centre, Thane, Maharashtra, India.
Abdulgaphur AthaniDepartment of Engineering Technology, University Technical Malaysia Melaka, Melaka, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The human biofield serves as an indicator of an individual's physical and emotional health status. Biofield-based therapeutic techniques, also known as complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) techniques such as Reiki, Therapeutic Touch, and Pranic Healing, leverage this information in the preliminary assessment phase before treatment initiation. These modalities are increasingly integrated as complementary methods within health diagnostic frameworks. Among the techniques employed for biofield visualization, gas discharge visualization (GDV) and polycontrast interference photography (PIP) are the predominant imaging methodologies. Notably, the majority of scientific investigations and empirical studies have primarily utilized GDV-derived images, with comparatively fewer studies focusing on PIP-based data. Purpose: The primary objective of this study is to identify energy imbalances within the pancreatic region using biofield imaging and to utilize these patterns for classifying subjects as diabetic or nondiabetic. This work emphasizes the relevance of biofield information in health assessment and evaluates its potential for supporting energy-based diagnostic approaches. Materials and Methods: Color-based clustering methods were applied for segmentation. A transfer learning-based ensemble framework was developed using pretrained convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures ConvNeXtBase and ResNet50 to classify biofield images into diabetic and nondiabetic categories. Grid search optimization identified the optimal hyperparameters, which were applied during fine-tuning to improve feature learning. Ensemble model was evaluated, with the ConvNeXtBase + ResNet50 combination achieving the highest accuracy of 99.12%. Robust performance validation was ensured using 5-fold cross-validation to minimize sampling bias and enhance generalization. Results: The ensemble of ResNet50 and ConvNeXtBase achieved the highest accuracy of 99.12%, outperforming individual models (ConvNeXtBase: 97.93% and ResNet50: 96.28%). Receiver operating characteristic analysis confirmed strong reliability with area under the curve values above 0.99 for both classes (diabetic and nondiabetic). The 5-fold cross-validation analysis further demonstrated the robustness of the proposed ensemble model, achieving a mean accuracy of 97.45%, indicating highly consistent performance across different dataset partitions. Conclusions: The CNN-based models can be trained to classify the biofield images, and this approach can enable automated analysis of biofield images. The approach of using clustering, deep learning, and ensemble modeling as analyzed and described in this study seems to be highly effective. The overall system of biofield imaging and automated clustering can act as a potential noninvasive diagnostic support tool, though further testing with larger datasets and expert validation is necessary for clinical application.

Indexed as

Biofield imageclustering image segmentationdeep learning techniquesgas discharge visualizationhyperparameter tuningpancreas energypolycontrast interference photographytransfer learning techniques

Identifiers

PMID42039726
PMCPMC13105384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.