Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42039723›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical physics

Evaluation of Residual Liver Motion Using Multiphase Computed Tomography in Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: A Comparison of Three Motion Management Techniques.

P M Jayadevan, Sudesh, N S Shine, K Nithin, S Arathi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical physics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

P M JayadevanDepartment of Physical Sciences, Banasthali Vidyapith, Banasthali, Rajasthan, India.
SudeshDepartment of Physical Sciences, Banasthali Vidyapith, Banasthali, Rajasthan, India.
N S ShineDepartment of Physical Sciences, Banasthali Vidyapith, Banasthali, Rajasthan, India.
K NithinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rajagiri Hospital, Aluva, Kerala, India.
S ArathiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rajagiri Hospital, Aluva, Kerala, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The liver is highly susceptible to internal motion during stereotactic body radiotherapy, requiring effective motion management. This study used multiphase computed tomography (MPCT) to assess residual liver movement under deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH), abdominal compression (AC) and free breathing (FB), comparing patient-specific internal target volume (PSITV) and generalized internal target volume (GITV). Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of 57 patients with multiple hepatic targets was conducted, where motion management techniques included DIBH ( Results: Maximum motion occurred in the CC direction, highest in FB (6.73 ± 0.83 mm), followed by AC (5.91 ± 0.50 mm) and DIBH (5.36 ± 0.46 mm). ML and AP motions were similar across techniques: DIBH (2.92 ± 0.33 mm, 3.08 ± 0.38 mm), AC (3.02 ± 0.26 mm, 3.66 ± 0.51 mm), and FB (3.00 ± 0.31 mm, 3.37 ± 0.53 mm). Differences were not statistically significant ( Conclusion: MPCT identified residual hepatic motion across motion management techniques, highlighting PSITV's role in improving dosimetric precision and reducing radiation exposure to adjacent organs and normal liver.

Indexed as

Internal target volumeliver motionmotion managementmultiphase computed tomographystereotactic body radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID42039723
PMCPMC13105368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.