ArticleJournal of medical physics
Dependence of Resolution Properties on Display Field-of-view Size in Deep Learning-based Reconstruction Computed Tomography Images for Peripheral Vascular Imaging.
Article in Journal of medical physics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) has transformed computed tomography (CT) imaging by providing superior noise reduction and image enhancement compared to conventional filtered back projection (FBP). This study aimed to elucidate the impact of display field-of-view (D-FOV) size on the spatial resolution properties of DLR images, particularly when assessing small vascular signals relevant to head CT angiography. Materials and Methods: A vascular phantom containing circular signals with diameters of 0.5 mm and 1.0 mm, filled with iodine contrast medium, was used. Images were reconstructed using three methods: FBP, model-based iterative reconstruction (IR), and DLR, all with standard denoising settings. Three D-FOV sizes (100 mm, 200 mm, and 400 mm) were evaluated. Spatial resolution was quantitatively assessed using task transfer function (TTF) measurements, derived from the Fourier transforms of the vascular signal profiles. Results: FBP images exhibited consistent TTF values regardless of D-FOV size. In contrast, both IR and DLR images showed lower TTF values for the smaller (0.5 mm) signals compared to the 1.0 mm signals across all D-FOV settings. Moreover, TTF values in IR and DLR images decreased progressively with increasing D-FOV size. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that spatial resolution, as quantified by TTF, is adversely affected by both smaller signal diameters and larger D-FOV sizes in IR and DLR reconstructions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.