Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42039675›Full record

ArticleBilingualism (Cambridge, England)2026

Investigating individual differences in adult bilinguals' spelling of cognates: An analysis of cross-linguistic effects.

Valeria M Rigobon, Nuria Gutiérrez, Ashley A Edwards, Laura M Steacy, Donald L Compton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bilingualism (Cambridge, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Valeria M RigobonAustralian Catholic University, Australian Centre for the Advancement of Literacy, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7089-1764
Nuria GutiérrezFlorida Center for Reading Research, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2809-1608
Ashley A EdwardsFlorida Center for Reading Research, USA.
Laura M SteacyDepartment of Educational Psychology, University of Connecticut, USA.
Donald L ComptonAustralian Catholic University, Australian Centre for the Advancement of Literacy, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Examining 62 college students who are bilingual in Spanish and English, this study assessed key predictors of irregular English word spelling accuracy, including cognates and non-cognates. Explanatory item response models tested the contributions of word-level (e.g., orthographic similarity [OS] and phonemic similarity [PS] between English and Spanish word forms) and person-level predictors (e.g., literacy skills in English and Spanish) to item-level spelling accuracy. In line with prior investigations of cognate spelling in English, spelling accuracy was predicted by generally stronger English decoding skill and higher OS, with no significant influence of Spanish abilities. However, OS effects diminished after removing identical cognates from the outcome variable. An exploratory analysis revealed similar effects of English and Spanish decoding fluency on the likelihood of non-cognate spelling accuracy. These results have implications for understanding how orthographic representations of cognates are stored and accessed in the bilingual lexicon, particularly in alphabetic orthographies.

Indexed as

bilingualismcognate facilitation effectcognatesindividual differencesspelling

Identifiers

PMID42039675
PMCPMC13107191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.