ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Defining the DNA Binding Specificity of GRHL2.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Grainyhead-like 2 (GRHL2) is an epithelial transcription factor with context-dependent regulatory roles, yet the sequence rules governing its DNA recognition remain incompletely defined. In this study, a high-density genomic Specificity and Affinity for Protein (SNAP) DNA-binding array containing 772,732 tiled probes derived from GRHL2 ChIP-seq regions was used to resolve GRHL2 binding specificity at 6 base pair resolution across genomic sequences. From high-affinity probes, de novo motif analysis recovered the canonical 5'-AACCGGTT-3' motif. Sequence specificity landscapes revealed a stepwise reduction in binding as mismatches were introduced, with the strongest effects at the C (position 3) and G (position 6) within the motif, greater tolerance at the central CG dinucleotide, and intermediate tolerance at the A/T bases at the motif edges. This analysis also demonstrated the influence of nearby flanking sequences. Extended motif and spacing analyses indicated dimeric binding at paired motifs, with periodic helical spacing consistent with interactions on the same face of the DNA helix. Integration of SNAP array binding with ChIP-seq data distinguished direct, motif-encoded GRHL2 occupancy from indirect, cofactor-mediated recruitment at genomic sites. These results define the sequence specificity of GRHL2 interactions with variations in the DNA consensus motif and flanking sequences within an endogenous genomic context.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.