ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Robust MR-AIV: A Systematic Study of Robustness Improvement and Sensitivity Analysis of MR-AIV.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cerebrospinal and interstitial fluid transport play a central role in brain metabolic waste clearance, yet non-invasive quantification of deep-brain flow dynamics remains challenging. Magnetic Resonance Artificial Intelligence Velocimetry (MR-AIV) is a physics-informed neural network framework that infers three-dimensional velocity, pressure, and permeability fields from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI by embedding porous-media flow physics into the learning process. Here, we present a methodological refinement and systematic evaluation of MR-AIV. We introduce a universal, anatomically informed, region-of-interest-based permeability initialization that improves anatomical alignment and physical consistency across subjects. We quantify the sensitivity of inferred fields to key modelling choices, including initialization strategies, permeability bounds, diffusivity assumptions, signal-concentration relationships, and measurement noise. Across these conditions, MR-AIV yields stable velocity and permeability estimates with preserved spatial structure. Together, these results establish practical guidelines and identify stable operating regimes for reliable deployment of MR-AIV. By improving robustness and reproducibility, this work strengthens MR-AIV as a minimally invasive approach for mapping brain-wide porous fluid transport and supports its application to studies of neurological health and disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.