ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Dissociating stimulus encoding and task demands in ECoG responses from human visual cortex.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Brain responses to sensory stimuli depend on the specific task performed by the observer. Previously, fMRI measurements in ventral temporal cortex (VTC) showed that BOLD responses to visual input scale with task demands. This scaling of BOLD responses is thought to be driven by the engagement of cognitive functions required for the task. To better understand how these cognitive task demands influence neural activity in VTC, we measured electrocorticography (ECoG) responses to images of varying contrast in two human participants during either a fixation or image categorization task. ECoG high frequency broadband activity (>70 Hz) showed that local neuronal responses increased with image contrast as expected for sensory encoding, and were scaled by task demands approximately 200 ms after stimulus onset. In contrast, ECoG low frequency activity in the alpha/beta range (8-28 Hz) was insensitive to image contrast and showed larger decreases with increasing task demands. These results indicate that high frequencies in VTC reflect both the encoding of sensory inputs and task demands, similar to prior BOLD response measurements, whereas low frequency oscillations represent task demands, not sensory inputs per se. In line with the interpretation that low frequency oscillations reflect pulsed inhibition, we speculate that a power decrease in low frequency oscillations amplifies neural activity in VTC in support of visual task demands.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.