Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42039584›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

Community needs for FAIR pathogen data.

Geert van Geest, Daniel Thomas-Lopez, Anna A Feitzinger, Lily A Weissgold, Sam Halabi, Isabel Cuesta, Erik Hjerde, Kim Tamara Gurwitz, Nishtha Arora, Aitana Neves and 2 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Geert van GeestSIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1561-078X
Daniel Thomas-LopezEMBL's European Bioinformatics Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2210-6263
Anna A FeitzingerCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7245-4405
Lily A WeissgoldLeibniz Institute DSMZ, Braunschweig, Germany.ORCID 0009-0000-4765-670X
Sam HalabiCenter for Transformational Health Law, Georgetown University, Georgetown, Washington D.C., USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4603-8480
Isabel CuestaBioinformatics Unit, Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7911-9041
Erik HjerdeThe Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-6014-1249
Kim Tamara GurwitzEMBL's European Bioinformatics Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1992-5073
Nishtha AroraCenter for Transformational Health Law, Georgetown University, Georgetown, Washington D.C., USA.ORCID 0009-0003-9236-3641
Aitana NevesSIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3984-6842
Patricia M PalagiSIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9062-6303
Jason J WilliamsCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3049-2010

Funding

Pathogen Data NetworkU24AI183840 · NIAID · SWISS INSTITUTE OF BIOINFORMATICS · PI Christophe Dessimoz, Sam Fo Halabi · 2024 to 2026
$9.1M
NIAID NIH HHS U24 AI183840
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Datasets related to infectious diseases are essential for public health decision-making, yet their reuse remains limited by persistent barriers to data sharing and integration. Achieving data that are Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR) is widely recognized as essential for accelerating scientific discovery and enabling coordinated responses to emerging threats, but the needs of the global pathogen data community have not been systematically characterized. Aim: This study, conducted by the Pathogen Data Network (PDN), aims to identify infrastructural and educational priorities among stakeholders working with infectious disease-related data in order to guide community-responsive support for data sharing and interoperability. Methods: A cross-sectional stakeholder survey was disseminated to a well-defined expert population within PDN networks and via open professional channels. A total of 136 responses from researchers, healthcare professionals, bioinformaticians, and educators were analyzed descriptively to identify prioritized barriers, training needs, and preferred support mechanisms. Results: Respondents consistently identified structural constraints as the primary impediments to effective data use, including limited funding (74%), data-aggregation challenges (68%), and a shortage of skilled personnel (52%). Respondents identified bioinformatics for infectious disease research (68%) as the highest priority for training, followed by guidance on using the integrated pathogen data and tools portal provided by the PDN, the Pathogens Portal (51%). The Pathogens Portal was also ranked as the most essential PDN resource (72%). Preferred training formats included virtual short courses (68%) and webinars (66%). Notably, while researchers emphasized technical subjects like machine learning, educators prioritized foundational case studies. Conclusion: These findings provide an evidence-based diagnostic of community needs and suggest that barriers to FAIR pathogen data are predominantly systemic rather than purely technological. The survey framework and openly available dataset offer a reusable template for assessing needs in other communities and regions. By aligning training, infrastructure development, and outreach with empirically identified priorities, organizations supporting infectious disease research can strengthen the interoperability and reuse of data and establish a benchmark for future community-driven improvements.

Identifiers

PMID42039584
PMCPMC13104867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.