ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
A standardized framework resolves ambiguity in motor neuron loss across neurodegenerative diseases.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motor neuron (MN) loss is a hallmark of neurodegenerative disorders, yet its assessment remains variable, confounding mechanistic and therapeutic interpretation. To address this, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) mouse studies, revealing 60% variability in reported MN loss, largely attributable to nonspecific spinal cord sampling. Using a whole-segment approach with tissue clearing, MN tracing, and multimodal imaging, we confirmed segment-dependent differences in MN counts. Common MN markers (SMI-32, Nissl) lacked specificity, whereas choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) provided robust labeling in murine and human spinal cords. Deep learning-based whole-mount segmentation enabled unbiased MN quantification and validated manual counts. Integrating analysis with computational modeling established segment sampling as a key driver of variability and revealed degeneration patterns: widespread MN loss in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), selective MN loss in severe SMA, and preservation in mild SMA models. These findings establish a framework for reproducible MN quantification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.