ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Modeling VEGF and GLUT1 Expression as Coadapted Foraging Strategies in Cancer.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Natural selection acting on cancer cells within their tumor microenvironment should favor cells with fast or efficient nutrient uptake strategies. Here, we develop and analyze a game-theoretic model focusing on the coadaptation between two foraging traits: vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1). Studies show that VEGF and GLUT1 are often co-expressed and are associated with more aggressive tumor phenotypes and poor clinical prognosis. VEGF is a diffusible paracrine factor that recruits blood vessels towards neighborhoods of cancer cells (angiogenesis). GLUT1 is a cell-surface transporter that enables the uptake of nutrients, especially glucose. We model these strategies operating at different scales: VEGF influences resource availability at the neighborhood level, while GLUT1 determines resource uptake at the cellular level. For VEGF, we introduce a resource-sharing continuum. With no resource sharing, cells access resources in proportion to their VEGF contribution. With uniform sharing, cells have equal access to resources, regardless of their VEGF contribution. The former leads to a tragedy of the commons and overproduction of VEGF. The latter yields a public goods game with moderate VEGF expression matching a group optimum. GLUT1 expression mediates uptake of resources recruited by VEGF and is largely independent of the degree of resource sharing. Therapeutically, both VEGF and GLUT1 inhibitors are more effective in high resource-sharing neighborhoods and less so as resource sharing declines. Overall, inhibition of GLUT1-mediated uptake emerges as more effective. The model, perhaps the first to consider VEGF and GLUT1 as coadaptations, emphasizes the need to consider cancer cell traits jointly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.