Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42039563›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

Temporal Structure of Reward Availability and Sensory Uncertainty Modulate Allocation Dynamics in Naturalistic Foraging.

Panos Alefantis, Yaxin Guo, Noushin Quazi, Cristina Savin, Dora E Angelaki, Xaq Pitkow, Najib J Majaj

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Panos AlefantisDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA.
Yaxin GuoCenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA.
Noushin QuaziCarnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Cristina SavinCenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA.
Dora E AngelakiCenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA.
Xaq PitkowCarnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Najib J MajajCenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA.

Funding

Computational Dynamics in Neural Populations of Freely Foraging vs. Restrained MonkeysRF1NS127122 · NINDS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI MAJAJ, NAJIB JUDEH · 2022 to 2022
$2.8M
Computational Dynamics in Neural Populations of Freely Foraging vs. Restrained MonkeysR01NS127122 · NINDS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI Najib Judeh Majaj · 2026 to 2026
$768k
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS127122NINDS NIH HHS RF1 NS127122
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adaptive foraging requires animals to combine uncertain sensory cues with predictions about when rewards are likely to occur. While theoretical models describe how animals should allocate their effort under variable-interval reward schedules, it remains unclear how the timing or rewards and the reliability of sensory cues affects behavior. We developed a continuous foraging task in which freely moving macaque monkeys navigated among three reward patches. Rewards became available at unpredictable times, with their availability signaled by a visual cue of varying reliability. We also varied the schedule of reward availability: in some conditions, rewards were equally likely to become available at any moment (exponentially distributed intervals), while in others the interval distribution was more concentrated around a particular mean (gamma-distributed intervals) which increased the cost of premature responses. Under exponential schedules, monkeys eventually allocated their time at different patches according to reward schedules, and cue reliability had only modest effects. Under gamma-distributed intervals, monkeys more quickly learned to differentiate between patches. Their choices were more strongly dependent on predicted reward timing, particularly when sensory cues were highly reliable. These results show that both the timing of rewards and reliability of sensory cues shape how animals allocate their time and effort in continuous naturalistic foraging tasks.

Identifiers

PMID42039563
PMCPMC13104946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.