ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Learning to select computations in recurrent neural circuits.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Two hallmarks of biological computation are its flexibility and efficiency. These features are often attributed to cognitive control processes that balance external utility against computational cost. However, how the brain could implement such adaptive control remains unknown. Here, we provide one possible answer by combining the computational theory of rational meta-reasoning with a meta-learning algorithm recently proposed as a model of prefrontal cortex. This yields a recurrent neural network model that learns to select computations. In simple choice tasks, the model approximates the algorithms and representations of optimal symbolic models and reproduces neural dynamics observed in macaque orbitofrontal cortex. In multi-step planning tasks, the model replicates key behavioral signatures of human planning strategies and captures human neural dynamics associated with step-by-step mental simulation. Our framework unifies meta-reasoning and meta-learning by showing that learning to reason can be understood as learning to learn from information generated by one's own cognitive operations, providing a mechanistic account of how adaptive control of thought can be implemented in neural systems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.