ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Comparative study of two xanthan gum glycosyltransferases combining AI structure predictions and molecular modeling.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Xanthan gum is a widely used industrial polysaccharide employed as a thickening and stabilizing agent in food, pharmaceutical, and technological applications. Its biosynthesis involves membrane-associated glycosyltransferases that assemble the repeating unit at the cytoplasmic side of the inner membrane. Among them, GumH and GumI catalyze consecutive reactions using the same donor substrate, guanosine 5'-diphospho-alpha-D-mannose, but with opposite stereoselectivity. Despite their biochemical characterization, structural insights into their catalytic mechanisms and membrane interactions remain limited, hindering a detailed understanding of their function and future engineering efforts. In this work, we combined artificial intelligence-based structure prediction with atomistic molecular dynamics simulations to investigate the structural organization and substrate-binding modes of GumH (family GT4) and GumI (family GT94). The predicted apo structures exhibit a conserved GT-B fold but differ in interdomain flexibility and membrane-anchoring strategies. GumH displays a more structured interdomain linker and a defined clamp-like region in the acceptor-binding domain, consistent with stable membrane interaction, whereas GumI shows a more flexible linker and an open groove architecture. Modeling of the donor-bound complexes reveals distinct substrate-binding modes. In GumH, it adopts a geometry consistent with its retaining stereochemical outcome, positioning the sugar close to the conserved catalytic residue. In contrast, GumI exhibits a different donor orientation, lacking a clearly positioned catalytic base near the reactive center, suggesting a substrate-assisted catalytic mechanism. Although the predicted ternary complexes show limited stability in our simulations, they provide chemically reasonable conformations and offer structural insights into substrate recognition, membrane association, and stereochemical control in these two glycosyltransferase families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.