Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42039422›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

Fast and accurate resolution of ecDNA sequence using Cycle-Extractor.

Mahsa Faizrahnemoon, Jens Luebeck, King L Hung, Suhas Rao, Gino Prasad, Ivy Tsz-Lo Wong, Matthew G Jones, Paul S Mischel, Howard Y Chang, Kaiyuan Zhu and 1 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mahsa FaizrahnemoonDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Jens LuebeckDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
King L HungDepartment of Neuroscience, Scripps Research, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Suhas RaoDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Gino PrasadDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Ivy Tsz-Lo WongDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Matthew G JonesDepartment of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Paul S MischelDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Howard Y ChangAmgen Research, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Kaiyuan ZhuDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Vineet BafnaDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5810-6241

Funding

Software and algorithms for elucidating the structure, function, and evolution of extrachromosomal DNAU24CA264379 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BAFNA, VINEET, MESIROV, JILL P. · 2021 to 2025
$3.5M
Computational methods for detecting patterns of complex genomic variationR01GM114362 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Vineet Bafna · 2016 to 2026
$3.1M
eDyNAmiC - UCSDOT2CA278635 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Vineet Bafna · 2022 to 2026
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS OT2 CA278635NCI NIH HHS U24 CA264379NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM114362
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA) plays a key role in cancer pathology. EcDNAs mediate high oncogene amplification and expression and worse patient outcomes. Accurately determining the structure of these circular molecules is essential for understanding their function, yet reconstructing ecDNA cycles from sequencing data remains challenging. We introduce Cycle-Extractor (CE) for reconstruction. CE accepts a breakpoint graph derived from either short or long read sequencing data as input and extracts a cycle with the maximum length-weighted-copy-number. CE utilizes a mixed-integer linear program (MILP) and a separate traversal procedure, enabling fast optimization and compatibility with free solvers. We evaluated CE against CoRAL (long-read-based quadratic optimization), Decoil (long-reads), and AmpliconArchitect (AA for short reads) on both simulated data and real cancer cell lines. On simulated ecDNA, CE achieves performance comparable to CoRAL across three accuracy metrics and consistently outperforms AA and Decoil. On cancer cell lines, CE produces longer and heavier cycles than AA, and achieves performance similar to CoRAL. Moreover, CE is, on average, 40× faster than CoRAL. These results demonstrate that CE accurately reconstructs ecDNA from both short- and long-read sequencing data, while long-read inputs allow CE to recover more complete and higher-confidence ecDNA structures. CE improved the prediction of many ecDNA structures. On a PC3 ecDNA containing

Indexed as

breakpoint graphscancer genomicscycle reconstructionextrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA)long-read and short-read sequencingmixed-integer linear programming (MILP)

Identifiers

PMID42039422
PMCPMC13105081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.